Step 3: Dispute the Copyright Notification
Once that you have determined that your video is in fact fair use, in order to get it restored you will need to dispute the copyright notice. This will be done differently depending on how your video was blocked.
Disputing a Content ID Match - View video tutorial
If your video was blocked by YouTube's automatic Content ID system, you will need to dispute the content identification. To do this, follow the following steps.
- Go to your Video Manager page.
- Click on Copyright Notices in the left side bar.
- Find the video you wish to dispute, and click on the copyright status of the video, where it says something like, "Video blocked in some countries," or "Matched third party content." Note: As far as I know, the new "I acknowledge" button doesn't really do anything, so it doesn't matter if you click it or not.
- Scroll down to the bottom of the page, and click the link that says "I believe this copyright claim is not valid."
- From the list of reasons, select "My use of the content meets the legal requirements for fair use or fair dealing under applicable copyright laws" (or whatever other option is more suited to your situation). If you believe the Content ID match is simply wrong and your video does not contain any copyrighted content or the particular claimant does not own the copyright to it, select the option that best expresses the reason for your dispute.
- On the next page, check the box for "I am sure..." and click continue.
- On the next page, type a brief explanation of why you think your video is fair use. When disputing content ID blocks on my anime music videos, I usually say something like, "This video is fair use under U.S. copyright law because it is noncommercial and transformative in nature, uses no more of the original than necessary, and has no negative effect on the market for the original work."
- Type your full name (your actual name not your YouTube username) into the signature box.
- Check the box where it says you have a good faith belief that the material was disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification and click continue.
- On the dispute summary page, click the continue button, and then click ok when it asks you to confirm.
- Your video should then be automatically restored and should be viewable more or less immediately, though you may need to refresh the page a few times for it to work.
Go back to your Video Manager page and click on the video's copyright status again, and it should say that you disputed the claim, and it should give a date one month from the day your filed your dispute, by which the copyright holder must review your dispute and decide whether to release their claim or reinstate it.
If the copyright claimant reinstates their claim, your video will be re-blocked or monetized, depending on the policy set by the Content ID system. Until October 2012, this used to be the end of the line and the user was left without further recourse. Recently however, YouTube has implemented a new appeals process, under which you can file a second dispute against a reinstated claim and force the copyright claimant to either release the claim or resort to the DMCA notice and counter-notice process described below.
Appealing a Reinstated Content ID Claim (new as of October 2012) - View video tutorial
The appeals process is basically just a second dispute, telling the copyright claimant you are really serious that your video is not infringing their copyright. While it is yet another hoop to jump through to fight a false copyright claim, it is an improvement over the old system, which gave users essentially no recourse at this point.- If a disputed Content ID claim against a video has been reinstated by the copyright claimant, below the message on the Content ID match page saying the claim has been reinstated, there should be a link that says "I want to appeal a reinstated claim." Click this link and go through the process, following the instructions on each page.
- If you have not previously done so, you will be required to verify your YouTube account with a cell phone number capable of receiving text messages before you can proceed with the appeal. If you do not have a cell phone or your cell phone provider is not supported, you may need to buy a prepaid phone from a supported provider to use to verify your account. Once you enter your cell phone number, YouTube will send a verification code via text message to the phone, which you should then enter in the box provided to verify your account.
- Once you have verified your account, you will be required to enter your contact information (note: this will be provided to the copyright claimant) and provide a more detailed explanation of why your believe your video is not infringing. If you originally disputed the Content ID claim based on fair use, YouTube is going to make you prove you actually understand fair use by typing out a brief explanation of how your video meets each of the four factors of the statutory fair use test (see the previous section of this tutorial for descriptions of what each factor means). If you originally disputed the claim by saying you have a license to use the content in your video, you will be asked to provide a link to a license contract or other documentation that you have permission to use the content, which you can cut and paste into the provided text box.
- Check the acknowledgment at the bottom of the page, type your legal name as your signature, and click Appeal to submit your appeal.
- It should now bring you back to the Content ID matches screen. Your video should be viewable again pending the copyright claimant's response to your appeal. As with the original Content ID dispute, they will now have one month to respond (though it will probably be sooner), this time by either releasing their claim or filing a formal DMCA takedown notice. If they do the latter, your video will be removed once more and there will be a copyright strike issued against your account, just as if the video had been blocked by a DMCA notice to begin with. While this may seem like a bad thing, the advantage of this (compared to the way things used to work) is that it also gives you recourse to the DMCA counter-notice process, which is described below. If you still disagree with the copyright claim, you can file a DMCA counter-notice and have your video restored, in which case the copyright claimant will have to actually sue you in order to get the video removed permanently. See the next section of this tutorial for instructions on how to do that.
One final note about the new appeals process. YouTube has stated that this process will not necessarily be available for every video with a reinstated Content ID claim. You may not be able to appeal reinstated claims if you have outstanding DMCA copyright strikes on your account. Also, from what I have learned, the appeals process does not appear to be available for claims that were reinstated prior to fall of 2012. Assuming that you are otherwise in good copyright standing and the claim was reinstated after YouTube implemented the new policy, the appeals process should be available on all new reinstated claims.
For more information about the new appeals process, please see this YouTube help page, YouTube's blog post about the changes, and my blog post giving my initial reaction to the new system.
Filing a DMCA Counter-notice - View video tutorial
A DMCA takedown notice is a formal notice of copyright infringement by a copyright owner. You should know if your video was taken down as a result of a DMCA takedown notice because you would have gotten an email from YouTube saying that there is now a "strike" against your account, which will also show up in your Account Status page. If this is the case, in order to get your video restored, you will have to file a formal DMCA counter-notice with YouTube.
There are two ways to submit a counter-notice. (1) The easiest and best way is to use YouTube's webform for submitting counter-notices (accessed via your Video Manager page). (2) You can also email your counter-notice to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it . If you choose to write a counter-notice yourself and submit it by email, ChillingEffects has an excellent Counter-notice generator, which you can use to generate a counter-notice to email to YouTube.
1. Using YouTube's Counter-Notice Webform (Recommended Method)
The best method to submit counter-notices to YouTube is to use the handy webform YouTube has provided for this purpose.
- Go to YouTube's counter-notice webform, which you can reach by going to your Video Manager page or your Copyright Notices page and clicking on the link next to the video that was taken down.
- Fill in all the required information. This includes your YouTube screen name, your true legal name and true residential address (note: this information will be sent to the copyright claimant), the email address associated with your YouTube account, the URL of the removed video, and the required statements swearing that your counter-notice is not fraudulent and consenting to the jurisdiction of your local federal district court.
- Make sure to provide a justification for why you believe your video is fair use in the "message to YouTube" box. If you do not provide YouTube with a justification stating why you are filing the counter-notice, YouTube will reject your counter-notice without even forwarding it to the copyright holder. This message must be specific to your video. A generic statement describing fair use in general will not suffice. You have to describe why YOUR VIDEO is fair use, or else YouTube will reject your counter-notice. A good basic fair use rationale could be something like, "This video is fair use under U.S. copyright law because it is (1) non-commercial, (2) transformative in nature, (3) uses no more of the original work than necessary for the video's purpose, and (4) does not compete with the original work and could have no negative affect on its market."
- Though not required, it is a good idea to include this same statement in the "message to the party that made the copyright claim" box, so they know your reasons for filing a counter-notice as well.
- Type your first and last name at the end as your electronic signature and click submit.
2. Alternate Method: Write your own counter-notice
Note: Since YouTube changed submitting DMCA counter-notices to be done through your video manager page, I'm not entirely sure if this method still works.
If you do not wish to use YouTube's webform or you are submitting a counter-notice to a website other than YouTube, you can email a counter-notice to the site's copyright compliance address (in the case of YouTube, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ). The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) requires that a counter-notice contain the following specific elements, which are described on YouTube's help page here:
Last Updated on Sunday, 02 December 2012 21:28
Comments
It was a fandub and I wrote evereything on descrebtion that I dont own the anime and all those stuff
and I got my video removed and I got a warning ._.
hate youtube copyrights U_U
Which is what applies in my case, and I would not be able to produce a licence from the owner/s, whose permission is tacit as long as they are acknowledged. (I'm not a legal person so my language is "lay".) I am surprised that there isn't more serious and educated discussion of this in the public domain.
If I cannot work this out it means that opportunist* claimants can freely advertise on videos when they have no right to. Galling!
*Footage of an osprey nest is said to contain material from a ringtone RIOU Octave Shift!
Thank you for your time, Patrick.
I've had this happen in the past on a couple other AMVs, and was able to dispute them just as easily, although the procedure was slight different.
Thanks for the heads up on this, and for giving me (and other) creators the information we need in order to combat these claims.
I mean, I've had many fans of my videos go out and buy the anime/music that my videos showcase, and I'm not many any money whatsoever on the many hours of labor I've put into them. If anything, these companies should be thanking us for helping expose their material. ;p
Thanks again!
I added credit to the copyright claimant in the description section just in case.
I don't think that's quite true; a few months ago I disputed a claim on a video I had deleted after receiving the strike, and it still went through and I won the case.
On another note, as anyone ever seen this version of the message? "We are concerned that you may be misusing our counter-notification process
and because of this, we are unable to honor this request. Please
understand that filing a counter-notification may result in the claimant
filing a lawsuit against you for copyright infringement."
This is the first time I received this message after filing a counter-notice, what do they mean by misusing? I filed the form as I did before. Guess I'll start over.
I still have doubts, though.
Is it fair use to use music in a tutorial that has nothing to do with the song? For example a tutorial on how to sculpt hair, and I want to play a song.
Also, how do I know which songs I can use by adding the link to its iTunes?
Thanks for your time!
Oh, I see!
One last question and sorry if it's silly.
I'm just confused by Michelle Phan on You Tube, she makes videos of makeup and adds the iTunes link to the songs.
How does she do that? Does that mean she pays something to use them?
I did sent out a counter notice about almost a month ago when I got those channel suspended,I haven't gotten a response yet other then the automated responses,I did sent counter notices while I had those channels but It didn't go through because I was so mad when those videos where removed that I said thing I shouldn't. The funny thing was one counter notice went through for one of same video I made that put on a different account.
I did but I'm still waiting on them,It was WMG that released the claim after it was removed on Youtube.It did let Google know about it on their help forum but no real response about what they're gonna do yet.
One account for one of my videos had 2 different claimants.First I can believe UMG but NFL,claim one of my YouTube poop videos which there was no sports footage used at all. I forgot that I did sent out counter notices.I don't mean to send out that many but I just want get my point across to Youtube and those copyright owners.
i wont get sued after i dispute the copyrgiht right ?? or is that only for filing a counter notice ??? pls answer me ASAP !!!
thkns
I would file another one but also state to copyright holders but specify why it is fair use and that they shouldn't file another DMCA take down notice just because they didn't respond within the slotted time.
I guess so,I don't know how many I sent through the email.I think maybe about 100 or so. But no word whether they been forwarded or not. They should've at least foward it once it's been queued to copyright team,I don't how long it takes to for them to do so through email.
I'm sure I did used the emails that were associated with those accounts. So now what?
Quoting Patrick McKay:
Yeah,you're right.I decided not share with Google help forums.I think other users are gonna chastise me again because my videos aren't transformative enough and that fact I used the whole work but it goes the heart of it. One of example of mine is inverting hue that artist would look blue and I raised the pitch to make them look and sound like Smurf just make example.
I hope this link to the GHacks article works, I have not yet investigated further on Google's tortuous forums.
http://www.ghacks.net/2012/10/04/youtube-improves-content-removal-process/?_m=3n.0038.662.kh0ao01p0t.og3
RSS feed for comments to this post