<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>YouTube Copyfraud & Abuse of the Content ID System</title>
		<description>Discuss YouTube Copyfraud & Abuse of the Content ID System</description>
		<link>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 03:35:15 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://fairusetube.org/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/22/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Alex says:</title>
			<link>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-921</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The only action that will force Google to take responsibility is a massive class action that will cause their ears to sting and cost them millions of dollars in recovery damages. Google was a wonderful organization with high ideals. It has become a nasty giant bully all teeth and no ears. What is required is for a well equipped law firm to back a class action worldwide. I will be the first in line to join and by what I can read there will be hundreds of millions of claimants. When Google is hit with a multimillion dollar claim. It will listen and it will take action. Until then, they could not care less how unfair and unjust their actions are and how many people are being hurt in the process. They simply don't care. So writing to them and complaining in forums such as this one is a total waste of time. I hope a law firm will see this post and act upon it. Alex]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 02:27:08 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-921</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ed says:</title>
			<link>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-848</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It seems that around the time I posted that YouTube changed their TOS and MCN affiliates are no longer immune to ID claims. Though there are still several advantages such as being able to claim your own content in the ID system and no need to ever prove copyrights as that is handled through your signed agreement. MCNs are Multi Channel Networks, which operate on YouTube but independently of YouTube. I belong to two MCNs for various reasons as you need to find an MCN that fits your channels needs and you can accept their TOS of how much money they take. For general and they take 25% use www.ScaleLab.com if you need more of a specific type for music I use http://www.youtube.com/user/indmusic]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 19:00:06 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-848</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ed says:</title>
			<link>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-831</link>
			<description><![CDATA[UMPG is universal Music, the others are probably rights collecting groups. Unfortunately anyone with a claim has the upper hand and you are guilty until proven innocent. User accounts like you have are subject to ID claims, but CMS accounts like they have are immune. So I can upload a song that already has 5 claims on it and add my name to the list, this is why you can have "multiple claims" on the same video. YouTube ruined my old channel due to this crap so I joined an MCN and am just Immune to ID claims. That's what I recommend doing, Scalelab.com will take you. YouTube is a biased and unfair system if you have a standard user account.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 22:59:47 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-831</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fred Boulay says:</title>
			<link>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-830</link>
			<description><![CDATA[well now there's a new update to YouTube's content ID system, apparently. I had not really received many new content IDs/copyright strikes, but today I got this one(below) The worst part is the song they claim "IMMORTALITY" is not in my video at all. It's falsely identified. Also there is no way to verify the song they claim as content ID'ed. They just put the name of the song. There absolutely should be a link to the song the system is claiming, but there isn't. So there's no way for me to check to verify if the claim is legit or not. I have disputed this, but it's really getting ridiculous. The only song I know of called Immortality is from Pearl Jam and this is definitely not it. Also anyone have any luck with finding these entities? TONO_CS KODA_CS SACEM TEOSTO_CS PEDL UMPG Publishing UMPI How can all these different entities claim the same (non-existent) song? " XCOM Enemy Within ep18: UFO Crash Site in Mexico [I/I/SW] Your video may include a song owned by a third party. For example, this might be a song playing in the background or someone performing a song. To hear the matched song please play the video on the right. The video will play from the point where the matched content was identified. Your video is available and playable. Here are the details: "Ghana country", musical composition administered by: 32:04 One or more music publishing rights collecting societies Claim released. "Respite", musical composition administered by: 28:56 CD Baby Claim released. "IMMORTALITY", musical composition administered by: 24:32 TONO_CS Your dispute awaiting response by 01/08/14 KODA_CS Your dispute awaiting response by 01/08/14 The Harry Fox Agency, Inc. (HFA) Your dispute awaiting response by 01/08/14 Warner Chappell Your dispute awaiting response by 01/08/14 Sony ATV Publishing Your dispute awaiting response by 01/08/14 UMPG Publishing Your dispute awaiting response by 01/08/14 SACEM Your dispute awaiting response by 01/08/14 TEOSTO_CS Your dispute awaiting response by 01/08/14 PEDL Your dispute awaiting response by 01/08/14 UMPI Your dispute awaiting response by 01/08/14 "]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fred Boulay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 22:27:47 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-830</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>will says:</title>
			<link>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-770</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree Jeremy.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:29:20 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-770</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jeremy holtom says:</title>
			<link>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-768</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I own a small record company and I have been receiving these bullshit copyright claims. I am strongly of the opinion that this needs to be challenged in the courts and I am prepared to consider a class action with others targetting just a handful of absurd cases. I strongly believe that this bullshit requires people to rise up and take a stand. Who is with me?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jeremy holtom</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:51:10 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-768</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ed says:</title>
			<link>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-767</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In case anyone wants to pursue a fight against YouTube and Copy-Fraud on PD works, the best place to ask is "New Media Rights" as they are a law firm that helps fairuse. In fact Patrick recommended them to me. As I said IMO you can't win this one as YT has to much power.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:40:43 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-767</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ed says:</title>
			<link>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-766</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yeah I know it is. I finally lost my monetize rights on ALL my channels due to copy-fraud complaints. Every single complaint I disputed but it still made no differnce. There are many including WB, In-Grooves etc. I have finally given up the fight as there is no way to win.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:32:41 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-766</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>will says:</title>
			<link>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-764</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It is STILL happening. Orchard has not stopped. You are missing Harry Fox and Egeda. They are also copyfraud culprits. Youtube should NOT allow Public Domain materials to be placed inthe content ID system in the first place. Its a criminal offense to claim rights you do not own. And it would not be difficult to facilitate this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:43:11 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-764</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Patrick McKay says:</title>
			<link>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-577</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just file a counter-notice.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Patrick McKay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:10:21 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fairusetube.org/youtube-copyfraud#comment-577</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
